
 |
Munchausen's Syndrome (MSBP)
Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy was the brainchild of Sir Roy Meadow, a
paediatrican. He claimed that some mothers harm their children to draw attention
to themselves.
In three separate appeal cases last year that involved his evidence, mothers
were acquitted of murdering their children and released from prison. Hundreds of
children have been taken into care over the past decade because of Sir Roy
Meadow's 'theory', and the Government is now conducting a review of these cases.
The chairman of the Criminal Cases Review Commission has already indicated that
cases which had relied solely on disputed medical evidence would be deemed
unsafe.
The General Medical Council recently announced that Sir Roy Meadow is to face a
disciplinary inquiry later this year
(2004).
For more information, visit www.msbp.com
See also :
Hansard debate 24/02/04
Extract as follows...
Vera
Baird (Redcar) (Lab): I congratulate the hon. Member for Tatton (Mr.
Osborne) on securing the debate, and on the diligence with which he has advanced
his constituents' interests and joined others with a common interest to oppose
this miscarriage of justice. I applaud the clarity with which he set out his
concerns. I am in the unique position in this Chamber of having cross-examined
Professor Meadow. His is not just the latest of a recent set of theories. He has
advanced his arguments for an enormous length of time. I cross-examined him in
1988. It is not unkind to say that he invented
Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy
and I do not use that word in a pejorative sense. He created it and has lived on
it ever since. He was a permanent professional witness in cases where he felt
that the
syndrome—now
highly questionable—existed, which is a difficult model. It seemed that
Professor Meadow was called into cases where there was no direct or
circumstantial evidence that would answer the question of whether injuries or
deaths of children were accidental or deliberately caused by a parent. He was
called in to say, "Now that I have looked at one of these parents"—almost
invariably the mother—"she resembles the type of person who does injure their
child". That was about the size of the evidence that he gave. It was an extra
difficulty for anyone labelled
as a sufferer of
Munchausen
syndrome
that he asserted that a characteristic of the
syndrome
was that people who had it denied that they had it. Consequently, one went in
circles trying to get out from under the expertise that he proffered, which was
dangerous indeed.
|
|