3. 'PREDICTING' CHILDREN WHO MAY COMMIT OFFENCES
Over the past few years this emphasis on ‘risk management’ of children has
grown, and several schemes have sprung up to monitor and ‘divert’ those
thought to be ‘at risk’ of offending behaviour, together with corresponding
electronic records and assessment tools.
Each local authority area has its own Youth Offending Team (YOT), the
multi-agency body responsible for making provision for youth justice,
including preventive work. It is answerable to the Youth Justice Board (YJB).
The YOT typically consists of representatives from police, probation,
education and social care.
YISP:
Children aged 8-13 may be referred to the ‘Youth Inclusion and Support
Panel’ (YISP) if they are thought to be potential offenders, in which
case an assessment is made using an in-depth tool called ‘ONSET’ and
the child will be referred to a 'diversionary' scheme. Data about them is
held on the Youth Inclusion and Support Panel Management Information
System (YISPMIS).
YIP:
Another scheme run by each YOT is the ‘Youth Inclusion Programme’
and ‘Junior Youth Inclusion Programme’ (YIP and Junior YIP)
In each area, YIPs target the 50 young people aged 13-16 thought most 'at
risk' of offending, truancy or social exclusion; Junior YIPs target those
aged 8-12.
The target group is identified via a process called ‘ID50’ which
involves referrals from local agencies, or uses other information. ID50
Guidance from the YJB says:
"there are clearly young people that are at risk but are not known by
local agencies: the YIP must endeavour to access these young people. We
believe that there is a considerable amount of local intelligence with
regard to these young people – the YIP should assume the role of an
identifying agency by collating information about these young people from
local contacts, residents, tenancy associations, community groups, street
wardens, etc."
Data about children involved in YIPs/Junior YIPs is held on the Youth
Inclusion Programme Management Information System (YIPMIS). ONSET is not
currently used on ‘YIP’ children, but the YJB believes it could be helpful
to begin using it.
CDRP:
In addition to YOTs, each area also has a ‘Crime and Disorder
Reduction Partnership’ (CDRP), a Home Office initiative that consists of
the same type of bodies as the YOT, plus voluntary sector and community
representatives. There is overlap in the work that CDRPs and YOTs cover;
children identified under one scheme may be provided for under another.
The CDRP is responsible for delivering a Home Office-designed scheme called
‘Prolific and Other Priority Offenders’ (PPO) which is divided into 3
tiers. The first tier of this scheme is called ‘Prevent and Deter’ and, as
the name suggests, focuses on those thought to show signs of being
predisposed towards offending. Data is held on the local PPO Performance
Management System.
OTHER SCHEMES:
There are several other ‘diversionary’ schemes run by different
combinations of agencies and voluntary sector providers – again, with
considerable overlap. To give some examples:
‘ON TRACK’ was established by the Home Office in 1999 and then taken over by
the Children’s Fund. It is aimed at 4 to 12-year-olds and their families in
areas of high deprivation and crime.
‘POSITIVE FUTURES’ is another Home Office initiative, started by the Drug
Strategy Directorate in partnership with Sport England and the YJB, but its
management has just been handed over to the voluntary sector provider,
‘Crime Concern’. It is aimed at those aged 10-19, especially those living in
deprived neighbourhoods.
‘POSITIVE ACTIVITIES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE’ is for 8-19-year-olds who are
identified as being ‘at risk’ of social exclusion or committing crime, or
who are ‘disengaged’ from education.
The identification of children for the various schemes inevitably involves
the sharing of information. The powers most usually relied upon to do this
are general ones contained in:
· Section 2 of the Local Government Act 2000, which gives each local
authority the power to do anything that promotes the economic, social and
environmental well-being of their area.
· Section 37 of the Crime And Disorder Act 1998 which places a duty on
“all persons and bodies carrying out functions in relation to the youth
justice system” to have regard to the aim of preventing offending by
children and young people.
RYOGENS
RYOGENS was developed as one project in a portfolio of e-government
national projects. The name is an acronym for Reducing Youth Offending
Generic National Solution, although this full title is no longer used, and
it is being positioned as having wider use in the whole ‘Every Child
Matters’ agenda.
RYOGENS is a web-based predictive and information-sharing system that
local authorities can buy into, offering a checklist of
concerns to be used in order to reach a decision that a child is
‘at risk’ of offending.
Until very recently, the website also provided a drop-down list of legal
reasons that practitioners could use to override refusal of consent to share
information; however, this seems to have disappeared from the site. Access
to the most recently archived version can be accessed via ARCH’s ‘database
masterclass’.
The local authority using the RYOGENS system decides how many ‘concerns’
from the checklist should be entered on the system before an alert is
triggered. At this point an assessment is made and the child is referred to
relevant services.
A child of any age can be recorded on the RYOGENS system. According to an
evaluation (again, accessible via ‘database
masterclass’ the youngest was 9 months old, although the report
acknowledges that in this case the power ‘appears to have been used
incorrectly’.
RYOGENS Reason for Concern
| Child: mental health |
Absent from home |
Child: substance misuse |
Frequently moving house |
| Child: physical health |
Involvement in crime / anti-social behaviour |
Non-constructive spare time/ easily bored |
Caring for relatives at home |
| Child: sexual health |
Denies involvement in crime / antisocial behaviour |
No other agency support< |
Lack of family support |
| Child: mental well being |
Self-harm |
Parent: physical health |
Domestic conflict/ violence |
| Missed medical appointment |
Dangerous behaviour |
Parent: mental health |
Family and/or peers involved in crime / anti-social behaviour |
| Not registered with healthcare professional |
Has harmed others |
Parenting difficulties |
Living in high crime area |
| Bad behaviour in school |
Has intent to harm others |
Parental lack of awareness of child's needs |
Animal cruelty |
| Exclusion from school |
Suffering actual harm |
Parent: substance misuse |
Substance availability |
| Learning difficulties |
Perpetrator of bullying or harassment |
Lack of facilities / equipment |
Social isolation |
| Poor school attendance/ truanting |
Victim of bullying or harassment |
Financial and/or housing difficulties |
Negative home influence on education |
top of page
back
| next |